| November 20, 2006 |
|
“California is currently one of the nation’s top three states producing forest products. How are changes in the forest products industry nationwide affecting the state’s economy?” Harwood: The forest industry has been undergoing an identity crisis in the past decade, and California is no exception. To give you some background: timber is California’s ninth most valuable crop. Every year, nearly 40% of the value of all timber harvested in California comes from privately owned forests in Humboldt and Mendocino counties. The forest products industry is vital to the economies of these two counties, generating about 13% of the personal income and 16% of the jobs. However, California’s forests are increasingly threatened by rural residential and agricultural development. If these threats are left unchecked, it will be to the detriment of local economies. It is imperative that we develop a strategic approach to these issues, and, with partners like The Conservation Fund, I believe we have a great head start in California. Selzer: The Fund and its partners created a bold new model for working forest partnerships in the West with the purchase of the 24,000-acre Garcia River Forest in northern California. The forest is now a permanently protected landscape that will generate revenue from sustainable timber harvests to support restoration activities that will improve air and water quality and provide good jobs for local economies—three things we believe are absolutely essential for the future health of California. “California’s success in resolving these emerging land-use challenges sets a good example for other states. Mr. Temple, do you see similar solutions being implemented in Texas?” Temple: One of our most promising opportunities is emerging in east Texas. For more than a century, this region has drawn on its cultural heritage, historic places and natural resources—especially forests—as a stable source of good jobs. But in the past few years, timber companies have announced the sale of over 2.7 million acres of east Texas forestland, much of which has been identified as ecologically significant habitat. In a region where the forest sector annually produces $22.1 billion in industry outputs and pays $2.9 billion to 79,500 workers, a large-scale conversion of forestland to development would be particularly devastating. Local economies would lose some of the region’s prime recreation destinations. Selzer: Preserving these resources for future generations will require an all-hands-on-deck approach—which is why we are working with leaders like Art Harwood and Buddy Temple to develop new models that balance economic development and environmental protection. In east Texas, we’re advancing land protection, sustainable forestry and ecotourism. In California, we’re demonstrating that sustainable forestry can be used as an effective tool to protect water, wildlife and jobs. By investing in the business of conservation, we can safeguard the nation’s exceptional ecological, cultural and commercial assets to achieve economic growth. Harwood: Thirty years ago, it was rare that environmentalists and foresters were sitting down together to hammer out solutions, rather than lawsuits. In the future, I think this sort of collaboration will become the norm. My hope is that the successful completion of these projects in California and Texas will establish a model for innovative, cost-effective forest conservation and job creation in these regions and beyond, at a scale never before seen in the U.S. |
| Read more» |
| Fund Buys Working Forest in California
|
| Read more» |
| NCIF Invests in Sustainable Forestry
|
| Read more» |
| Greenseams
|
| Read more» |
| Kodak and Partners Honor Greenway Advocates
|
| Read more» |